Six dimensions: TWAP, trailing stop, scaled/iceberg, conditional/OCO, funding shown pre-trade, and the advanced-mode ramp — scored for each venue plus us today, so the gap is visible at a glance. Then we turn it into a memo for tomorrow's review.
Hyperliquid makes TWAP a first-class order-type tab — set size + duration on one screen. Binance buries it behind an "Advanced" toggle; Bybit only exposes it via API. None of the three auto-suggest TWAP for large orders relative to book depth — that's the opening for us. (Hyperliquid is the same venue behind last week's −8% volume dip — worth out-shipping on UX, not just fees.)
Tap any cell for the detail and its source.
"TWAP is table stakes; the win is exposure — make it a first-class ticket tab and auto-suggest it for large orders. No competitor does the latter."
TWAP is table stakes — having it isn't the differentiator. The gap that matters: only Hyperliquid makes TWAP a first-class, one-screen order type; Binance buries it behind "Advanced", Bybit hides it in the API. And none of the three auto-suggest TWAP for orders large relative to book depth — that's our opening. Three recommendations below, each ready to open as a ticket on the TWAP epic.
✦ row = the dimension that should drive the spec.